华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 85-96.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.07.007

• 基础教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

基础教育集团化办学政策的执行阻滞与推进路向——基于“模糊—冲突”模型的中国语境解析

贾伟, 邹雪, 蔡其勇   

  1. 重庆市教育科学研究院,重庆 400015
  • 出版日期:2026-07-01 发布日期:2026-06-23
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“十四五”规划教育学一般课题“教育帮扶服务乡村振兴的长效机制与策略研究”(BHA220108)。

Policy Implementation Blockage and Promotion Direction of Group School-Running in Basic Education: Based on China’s Context Analysis of the “Ambiguity-Conflict” Model

Wei Jia, Xue Zou, Qiyong Cai   

  1. Chongqing Academy Of Education Science, Chongqing 400015, China
  • Online:2026-07-01 Published:2026-06-23

摘要:

在集团化办学政策纵深推进之际,如何实现从“规模竞速”向“质效跃升”跨越成为基础教育改革的攻坚靶点。本研究以中国语境下构建的集团化办学“模糊—冲突”模型为基础,立足政策执行“同一性—差异性”的逻辑架构,深入分析了名校办分校的集约管理型、强校带弱校的圈地帮扶型、跨域结对式的联动辐射型、异质多主体的合作发展型等典型执行案例的“模糊—冲突”样态,从资源依赖环境约束、权属职级关系失衡、利益群体力量施压、协同激励办法不足等四重动因整体性揭示了集团化办学政策执行阻滞的现实表征。在落实教育强国建设规划纲要精神、迈向基础教育高质量发展的新阶段,集团化办学正越来越贴近教育的底层逻辑和改革初心。对此,本研究提出凝聚价值共识、强化资源保障、厘定职权结构、推进现代治理及完善激励约束的建议,以期助力地方基础教育集团化办学的长效发展。

关键词: 基础教育, 集团化办学, 政策执行, “模糊—冲突”模型

Abstract:

During the in-depth implementation of the group school-running policy, how to realize the transformative leap from “scale-driven expansion” to “quality and efficiency improvement” has become a critical breakthrough focus in basic education reform. Based on the “ambiguity-conflict” model constructed in the context of China, this study focuses on the logical framework of “identity difference” in policy implementation, and analyzes the “ambiguity-conflict” patterns of typical implementation cases, such as the intensive management model of prestigious schools establishing branches, the land enclosure assistance model of strong schools supporting weak schools, the cross-regional pairing model of linkage and radiation, and the collaborative development model of heterogeneous multi-subjects. Furthermore, it comprehensively reveals the practical manifestations of the local implementation blockage of group school-running from four dimensions, including environmental constraints of resource dependency, the imbalance of ownership and rank relations, the pressure from interest groups, and insufficient collaborative incentive measures. In implementing the spirit of the Outline for Building a Leading Country in Education and moving towards the high-quality development of basic education, group school-running is increasingly approaching the fundamental logic and original intent of educational reform. To this end, the study proposes recommendations to foster long-term development of group school-running in local basic education, including strengthening resource support, clarifying the structure of authority, promoting modern governance, and improving incentive and constraint mechanisms.

Key words: basic education, group school-running, policy implementation, “Ambiguity-Conflict” model