|
B.M.Bass(1990).Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership : Theory, research, and managerial applications.New York : Free Press.
|
|
B.M.Bass & B.J.Avolio(1994).Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership.Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
|
|
R.R.Blake & J.S.Mouton(1985).The Managerial Grid III.Houston : Gulf.
|
|
H.Boles & J.Davenport(1975).Introduction to educational leadership.New York : Harper & Row Publishers.
|
|
L.C.Bolman & T.E.Deal(1991).Reframing organizations.San Francisco, CA : Jossey -Bass.
|
|
M.W.Browne & R.Cudeck(1993).Alternative ways of assessing model fit.In K.A.Bollen & J.S.Long (Eds.).Testing struc-tural equation models (pp.136 -162).Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
|
|
Burns (1978).Leadership.New York : Harper Torchbooks.
|
|
J.M.Burns(1978).Leadership.New Work : Harper & Row.
|
|
T.Bush & L.Bell(1995).The principals and practice of educational management.London : Paul Chapman Publishing.
|
|
R.V.Carlson(1996).Reframing and reform : Perspectives on organization, leadership, and school change.White Plains, NY : Long-man.
|
|
D.Cartwright & A.Zander(1960).Group dynamics : Research and theory (2nd ed.).Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.
|
|
J.Cohen(1960).A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37 -46.
|
|
CCSSO (Council of Chief State School Officers)(1996).Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium : Standardsfor school leaders.Washington, DC : Author.
|
|
R.P.Craig & C.J.Norris(1991).Values perception and future educational leaders.Journal of School Leadership, 1(3), 222 -234.
|
|
L.Crocker & J.Algina(1986).Introduction to classical and modern test theory.Orlando FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
|
|
R.Cudeck & M.W.Browne(1983).Cross -validation of covariance structures.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147 -167.
|
|
R.L.Daft(1994).Management (3rd ed.).Florida : Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
|
|
J.C.Daresh(1994).Restructuring educational leadership preparation : Identify needed conditions.Journal of School Leadership, 4 (1), 28 -38.
|
|
S.H.Davis(1998, November).Taking aim at effective leadership.Thrust for Educational Leadership, 6-9.
|
|
T.E.Deal & A.Kennedy(1982).Corporate cultures : The rites and rituals of corporate life.Reading, MA : Addison -Wesley.
|
|
M.DePree(1989).Leadership is an art.New York : Doubleday.
|
|
R.F.Elmore(2000).Building a new structure for school leadership.The Albert Shanker Institute, 1 -39.
|
|
M.G.Evans(1970).The effects of supervisory behavior on the path -goal relationship.Organizational Behavior and Human Perfor-mance 5, 277-298.
|
|
F.E.Fiedler(1967).A theory of leadership effectiveness.New York : McGraw -Hill.
|
|
D.Goleman, R.Boyatzis, A.McKee(2002).Primal leadership : Realizing the power of emotional intelligence.Boston : Harvard Busi-ness School Press.
|
|
J.I.Goodlad, R.Soder & K.A.Sirotnik(Eds.).(1990).The moral dimensions of teaching.San Francisco, CA : Jossey -Bass.
|
|
P.L.Grossman(1990).The making of a teacher : Teacher knowledge and teacher education.New York : Teachers College Press.
|
|
P.Hersey & K.Blanchard(1974).So you want to know your leadership style?Training and Development Journal, 6.
|
|
P.Hersey, K.H.Blanchard & D.E.Johnson(1996).Management of organizational behavior: utilizing human resources.Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
|
|
C.Hodgkinson(1991).Educational leadership : The moral art.Albany : State University of New York Press.
|
|
R.J.House & T.R.Mitchell(1974).Path -Goal Theory of leadership.Journal of Contemporary Business.
|
|
W.K.Hoy & A.E.Woolfolk(1990).Socialization of student teachers.American Educational Research Journal, 27 (2), 279 -300.
|
|
C.Hsieh & J.Shen(1998).Teachers, principal's and superintendents' conceptions of leadership.S chool Leadership & Management, 18 (1), 107 -121.
|
|
R.Kahn(1979).Psicologia social de las organizaciones.Social psicology in organizations.Mexico : Editorial Trillas.
|
|
T.J.Kalliath, A.C.Bluedorn & D.F.Gillespie(1999, February).A Confirmatory factor analysisof the competing values instrument.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 (1), 143 -158.
|
|
D.Katz & R.Kahn(1952).Some Recent Findings in Human Relations.In E.Swanson, T.Newcomb, & E.Hartley (Eds.), Read-ings in Social Psychology.New York : Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
|
|
R.Kelley(1992).The power of followership.New York : Currency and Doubleday.
|
|
H.Kerzner(1997).Project management.A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (6th ed.).Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
|
|
K.Lewin, R.Lippitt & R.K.White(1939).Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates.Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301.
|
|
R.Likert(1961).New patterns of management.New York : McGraw -Hill.
|
|
R.Likert(1967).The Human Organization.New York : McGraw -Hill.
|
|
R.Likert(1979).From production —and employee—centeredness to Systems 1 -4.Journal of Management, 5, 147 -156.
|
|
B.Malen(1994).Enacting site -based management : A political utilities analysis.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 249 -267.
|
|
D.L.Morgan(1988).Focus groups as qualitative research.Newbury, CA : Sage.
|
|
F.M.Newmann, B.Smith, E.L.Allensworth & A.Bryk(2001)Instructional program coherence : What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23 (4), 297 -321.
|
|
C.C.Phillips(2000).Issues of factorial invariance inherent in conceptual change : Teacher's evolving perceptions of classroom prac-tice.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Michigan.
|
|
L.Rodríguez -Campos(2002).The structure of the leadership construct : A test of factorial invariance using structural equation model-ing.Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Michigan.
|
|
C.Schriesheim & J.Bird(1979).Contributions of the Ohio State studies to the field of leadership.Journal of Management, 5, 135 -145.
|
|
R.E.Schumacker & R.G.Lomax(1996).A beginner'sguide to structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates, Publishers.
|
|
P.M.Senge(1990).The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.Broadway, NY : Publishing Group, Inc.
|
|
C.L.Shartle(1979).Early years of the Ohio State University Leadership Studies.Journal of Management, 5, 126 -134.
|
|
J.Shen(1993)." Teaching as a moral enterprise" revisited.Review of Education, 15 (3 -4), 333 -339.
|
|
J.Shen(2001).Teacher and principal empowerment : national, longitudinal, and comparative perspectives.Educational Horizons, 79 (3), 124-129.
|
|
J.Shen(2005).Principal'and teachers'power.In Shen, J.et al., School principals (pp.106-116).New York : Peter Lang Pub-lishing.
|
|
R.Soder(2001).The language of leadership.San Francisco : Jossey -Bass.
|
|
J.P.Spillane R.Halverson & J.B.Diamond(2001).Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Educational Researcher, 30 (3), 23-28.
|
|
R.G.Stakenas(1994).Program reform in administrator preparation : The process of change.NASSP Bulletin, 78(559), 28 -32.
|
|
D.W.Stewart & P.N.Shamdasani(1990).Focus groups : Theory and practice.Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
|
|
R.M.Stogdill & C.L.Shartle(1955).Methods in the study of administrative leadership.Columbus, OH : Bureau of Business Re-search, College of Commerce and Administration.
|
|
R.Tannenbaum & W.H.Schmidt(1973).How to choose a leadership pattern.Harvard Business Review.
|
|
S.D.Thomson(1992).National standards for school administrators.International Journal of Educational Reform, 1(1), 54 -58.
|
|
V.Vroom(1976).Can leaders learn to lead?Organizational Dynamics, 4.
|
|
C.H.Weiss & J.Cambone(1994).Principals, shared decision making, and school reform.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analy-sis, 16(3), 287 -301.
|
|
K.F.Widaman & S.P.Reise(1997).Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments :
|
|
Applications in the substance abuse domain.In K.J.Bryant, M.Windle & S.G.West (Eds.), The science of prevention : Method-ological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp.281 -324).Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
|
|
P.Wohlstetter, R.Smyer & S.A.Mohrman(1994).New boundaries for school -based management : The high involvement model.Ed-ucational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 268-286.
|