杜威与孔子的对话:1919—2019

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当杜威于1919年抵达中国的时候，在他的哲学立场和儒家传统之间进行公正平等对话的时机尚未成熟。彼时，杜威声名鹊起，而儒家传统却急剧衰落。杜威受到了当时领军学者的热烈欢迎，而同时"打倒孔家店"的口号也正流行。与过去不同，今天的中国已经是世界大国，儒家传统也再次复兴。杜威和孔子对话的时代已经到来。儒家的道德自我修养理论可以补充杜威的教育方案，而杜威的积极学习策略则可以填充儒家与科学和技术教育之间的鸿沟。杜威在中国的系列演讲中就曾经涉及中国的科学和技术教育问题。

关键词: 杜威, 孔子, 自我修养, 积极学习

Abstract: In 1919, when Dewey arrived in China, the time was not ripe for a dialogue on equal terms between his ideas and those from Confucian tradition. Dewey's reputation was on the rise; Confucianism was in sharp decline. Dewey was welcomed with open arms by China's leading intellectuals, while a popular slogan of the day proclaimed " Down with Confucius!" Today, by contrast, China is a great world power, and the Confucian tradition is once again ascending. It is now time to place Dewey and Confucius in dialogue, and to investigate how each can contribute to educational revitalization. In this paper I argue that the Confucian ideal of moral self-cultivation can supplement Dewey's educational program, while Dewey's active learning strategies can fill a gap in Confucian learning in science and technology, fields that occupied Dewey in his lectures in China.

Key words: John Dewey, Confucius, self-cultivation, active learning

伦纳德·瓦克斯. 杜威与孔子的对话:1919—2019[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 45-52.

Leonard Waks. John Dewey and Confucius in Dialogue: 1919-2019[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(2): 45-52.

参考文献

Allen, B. (2017). "Pragmatism and Confucian Empiricism", proceedings of the Conference, Fudan University.
Bary, W. T. D. (2007). "Confucian Education and the Point of Democracy", In W. T. De Bary. (Eds.). Confucian Tradition and Global Education, New York: Columbia University Press.
Boydston, J. A. (Eds.). (1967-1991). The Collected Works of John Dewey, 1882-1953. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bresciani, U. (2001). Reinventing Confucianism: The New Confucian Movement. Taipei: Taipei Ricci Institute.
Clopton, R. W. & Ou, T. C. (1975). John Dewey, Lectures in China, 1919-1920. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Elliott, J. & Tsai, C. T. (2008). What Might Confucius Have to Say about Action Research? Educational Action Research, 16, 569–578.
Hall, D. L. & Ames, R. T. (1987). Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ho, H. C. & Schneider, A. (2009). Confucianism and Modern Society. Conference Paper. Leiden, The Netherlands, 28-29 May.
Sigurdsson, G. (2015). Confucian Propriety and Ritual Learning. Albany: SUNY Press.
Tan, S. H. (2004). Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Tan, S. H. (2012). The Pragmatic Confucian Approach to Tradition in Modernizing China, History and Theory, Theme Issue 51, 23-44.
Van Norden, B. (2014). Wang Yangming. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wang-yangming/.
Waks, L. (2018). Thinking in Dewey’s Experimentalist Education: The Contribution of the Internet and Digital Tools. ECNU Review of Education, 1 (2), 1–2.
Wang, J. C. S. (2007). John Dewey in China: To Teach and to Learn. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Yang, J. (2016). When Confucius "Encounters" John Dewey: A Historical and Philosophical Analysis of Dewey’s Visit to China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Zou, Z.H. (2010). The "Dewey Fever" in Jiangsu and Zhejiang during the May Fourth Movement and Its Relation to the Cultural Tradition in Jiangnan. Chinese Studies in History,vol. 43, 43–62.

[1]	涂诗万. 两种对立的教育本质观：解析伊万·伊利奇对杜威的批评[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(12): 82-98.
[2]	涂诗万, 朱凯. 作为社会理论的“做中学”——深化杜威研究的一个新尝试[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(6): 14-25.
[3]	周勇. 新文化教育场域中的杜威访华与思想纷争[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(6): 58-70.
[4]	崔延强, 卫苗苗. 超越自由教育的逻辑架构：大学通识教育的结构性转向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(11): 69-77.
[5]	杨志翔. 论中国之行对杜威多元文化观念及民主思想的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 53-58.
[6]	仲建维, 涂悦. 外来的杠杆:20世纪20年代中国教育改革中的杜威[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 37-44.
[7]	冯加渔. 民主的多重面向:杜威Democracy and Education中文译名的世纪流变[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 29-36.
[8]	张华. 论杜威与中国教育改革[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 18-28.
[9]	刘云杉. 兴趣的限度:基于杜威困惑的讨论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 1-17.
[10]	尚恩·罗尔斯顿. 杜威在华经验考述(1919—1921):中国是如何改变杜威的？[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 59-62.
[11]	唐斌 . 杜威的探究性教学论：出场语境及其视域偏差[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(3): 55-62.
[12]	郭法奇. 传统教育哲学批判：杜威的思辩与逻辑[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(4): 89-95.
[13]	郭良菁. 解读杜威“教育无目的论”的文本依据辨析 ——兼论“教育目的”概念的拟人化使用问题[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(3): 17-24.
[14]	郭法奇. 学校改革是教育改革的中心？ ——杜威学校教育思想探究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2011, 29(3): 91-96.
[15]	陈桂生. 略论孔门诗书礼乐之教 ——基于“新基础教育”学生工作改革实践的研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2011, 29(3): 69-74.