华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 200-227.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.011

• 领域 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学治理实证研究2015—2019：特征、趋势与展望

周光礼1, 郭卉2   

  1. 1. 中国人民大学教育学院，北京 100872;
    2. 华中科技大学教育科学研究院，武汉 430047
  • 发布日期:2020-09-15

Empirical Research on University Governance 2015—2019: Characteristics, Trends and Prospects

Zhou Guangli1, Guo Hui2   

  1. 1. School of Education, Renmin University of China, Bejing 100872, China;
    2. School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430047, China
  • Published:2020-09-15

RichHTML

96

PDF

181

摘要： 2015—2019这五年里，在教育实证研究运动的推动下，“大学治理”这个充满理论思辨传统的研究领域开始尝试循证研究。以国内17本CSSCI来源教育期刊上的77篇大学治理实证研究论文为研究对象，以国外5本SSCI来源教育期刊上的22篇大学治理实证研究论文为参照对象，通过多维度的统计分析发现：在文献计量特征上，中国大学治理研究年度发文中的实证研究占比稳步提升；共被引文献反映出大学治理实证研究具有鲜明的知识输入特点，具有明显的跨学科特征。在知识生产特征上，研究主题从宏观转向微观，以“大学（组织）治理”为主；采用的研究方法具有多样性，以质性的“文献分析”和“个案分析”为主，实证研究的规范性偏低；大学治理实证研究以高校为主要分析单位；知识生产的迭代更新具有“政策依赖”性；大学治理实证研究这5年解决了系统层面、大学层面和基层学术组织层面治理的重要问题。由于研究者对教育实证研究方法掌握得不够充分，致使这种研究范式在知识积累上的优势尚未发挥出来。未来，大力提倡实证研究范式，规范研究方法，提升研究质量，是大学治理研究者的使命。

关键词: 大学治理, 实证研究, 文献计量, 研究方法

Abstract: In the five years from 2015 to 2019, driven by the movement of empirical research in education, a field full of theoretical and speculative traditions--university governance--began to attempt evidence-based research. This article examined 77 empirical research papers on university governance from 17 domestic CSSCI educational journals as the research object, and 22 empirical research papers on university governance from 5 foreign SSCI educational journals as the reference object. The multi-dimensional statistical analysis found that in terms of the metrological characteristics in literature, empirical research in China’s university governance research is rising steadily. The co-cited literature reflects that the empirical study of university governance has distinct characteristics of knowledge input. The empirical study of university governance has obvious interdisciplinary characteristics. In terms of the characteristics of knowledge production, the research topic turns from macro to micro, with “university (organization) governance” as the main topic. The research methods adopted are diversified, with qualitative “literature analysis” and “case analysis” as the main methods. The empirical study of university governance takes university as the main unit of analysis. The iterative updating of knowledge production has “policy dependence”. The five years of empirical research on university governance have solved some important problems of governance at the system level, university level and grassroots academic organization level. As the researchers have not fully mastered the methods of empirical research in education, the advantages of this research paradigm in knowledge accumulation have not been brought into play. In the future, it is the mission of university governance researchers to vigorously advocate empirical research paradigm, standardize research methods and improve research quality.

Key words: university governance, empirical research, bibliometrics, research methods