华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 44-55.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.01.004

• 教育数字化转型 • 上一篇    下一篇

生成式人工智能时代“学习的革命”:生成式自我调节学习

钟柏昌, 林小红   

  1. 华南师范大学教育信息技术学院,广州 510631
  • 出版日期:2026-01-01 发布日期:2025-12-31
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金教育学重点课题“人工智能教育学研究”(ACA250024)。

A Revolution of Learning in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence:Generative Self-Regulated Learning

Baichang Zhong, Xiaohong Lin   

  1. School of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
  • Online:2026-01-01 Published:2025-12-31

摘要:

随着生成式人工智能日益嵌入教育实践,传统自我调节学习理论的内在局限愈加凸显:其在本体论上忽视身体中介作用,在认识论上固守线性调节范式,在实践中则面临技术支持碎片化困境,难以有效支持学习者“学会学习”的复杂发展需求。生成式人工智能凭借生成性、人机交互性、高阶性与自主性,突破主客二元的认知结构,与学习者共同构成“主体—中介(技术)—客体”的三元系统,使学习迈向以“人技协同”为特征的内涵重构,直面“乔布斯之问”。据此,生成式自我调节学习应运而生。该理论以辩证建构主义与维果茨基的认知发展理论为宏观指引,融合人技关系、具身认知与对话理论等微观支架,构建出“纯粹思维—具身体验—深度认知”的三重循环路径。这不仅重塑了自我调节学习的逻辑理路,更充实了“学会学习”的时代内涵,可谓“学习的革命”。与此同时,生成式自我调节学习也可能引发反思性缺失、实践性异化、主体性解构与交往性疏离等风险,故应在技术工具理性与教育价值理性之间保持辩证平衡,确保教育始终服务于人的全面发展,推动构建具有时代特色和本土意蕴的中国教育学自主知识体系。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 学会学习, 自我调节学习, 生成式自我调节学习, 学习方式

Abstract:

As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) becomes increasingly embedded in educational practice, the inherent limitations of traditional self-regulated learning theory are becoming more pronounced: ontologically, it neglects the mediating role of the body; epistemologically, it adheres to a linear regulation paradigm; and in practice, it faces the challenge of fragmented technological support—making it difficult to effectively address learners’ complex developmental needs in learning to learn. With its generativity, human-computer interactivity, higher-order capabilities, and autonomy, GAI transcends the dualistic cognitive structure of subject and object. It co-constructs a triadic system of “subject-mediator (technology)-object” with the learner, thereby reshaping the meaning of “learning to learn” toward a model characterized by human-machine collaboration and directly addressing “Jobs question”. In this context, generative self-regulated learning (GSRL) emerges. Guided by dialectical constructivism and Vygotsky’s cognitive development theory at the macro level, and supported by micro-theoretical frameworks of human-technology relationship theory, embodied cognition theory, and dialogic theory, GSRL constructs a triple-loop pathway—“pure thinking-embodied experience-deep cognition”. This pathway not only redefines the logical framework of SRL but also enriches the contemporary connotation of “learning to learn”, signifying a genuine revolution of learning. At the same time, GSRL may pose risks such as loss of reflexivity, alienation of practice, deconstruction of subjectivity, and disruption of intersubjective communication. Therefore, a dialectical balance must be maintained between the instrumental rationality of technology and the value rationality of education, ensuring that education remains centered on human development and contributes to the construction of a Chinese educational knowledge system with both contemporary relevance and indigenous significance.

Key words: generative artificial intelligence, learning to learn, self-regulated learning, generative self-regulated learning, learning methods