华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 34-40.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2015.02.005

• 教育理论 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国高校学术委员会制度的演进与展望

蔡国春,潘震鑫,王春燕   

  1. 1. 江苏师范大学教育学部，徐州 221116；2. 江苏师范大学发展规划处，徐州 221116； 3. 泰州职业技术学院，泰州 225300
  • 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 蔡国春,潘震鑫,王春燕
  • 作者简介:蔡国春,潘震鑫,王春燕
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目：教育部人文社会科学研究项目（10YJA880004）；江苏省第四期“333工程”科研项目资助计划（BRA2012181）；“中国大学学术委员会制度研究”及江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目（PAPD）。

Evolution and Prospect of Academic Committee System in China’s Higher Educational Institutions

CAI Guochun & PAN zhenxin & WANG Chunyan   

  1. Department of Education, Jiangsu Normal University. Xuzhou 221116 Division of Development and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116 Taizhou College of Vocation and Technology, Taizhou 225300
  • Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-09-19
  • Contact: CAI Guochun & PAN zhenxin & WANG Chunyan
  • About author:CAI Guochun & PAN zhenxin & WANG Chunyan

RichHTML

37

PDF

1380

被引次数

18

摘要： 建国后我国高校学术委员会制度历经萌芽、初创到基本确立的演进历程。长期以来，理应由学术委员会所行使的学术权力与高校内部的政治权力、行政权力混沌不分。至《高等教育法》提出设立学术委员会的要求并明确其职责后，学术权力才从“潜隐”趋于“显现”。但总的来说，直至目前，学术权力仍处于依附状态。今后我们需要进一步强化对学术权力本质及其必要性的认识，将加强学术委员会制度建设作为推进现代大学制度建设的必然抓手，促进学术权力从“依附”走向“独立”。在这一方面，教育部颁布的《高等学校学术委员会规程》无疑具有里程碑意义，它意味着我国高校学术委员会从“制度设计”迈入“实践建设”的新时代。

关键词: 大学治理, 学术权力, 学术委员会, 制度演进

Abstract: In China’s higher education, the academic committee system has undergone three stages of development: budding, startup and establishment. For a long period of time, the academic power, which should have been exercised by the academic committee, has not been clearly separated from political power and executive power. Higher Education Act proposed the establishment of academic committee, stipulating the committee’s responsibility. As a result, the academic power has become more explicit than implicit. However, the academic power is still in the state of attachment. In future, it is quite necessary to strengthen the awareness of the nature and necessity of the academic power, and reinforce the building of the academic committee system in support of the construction of modern university system. In a long run, the status of the academic power should be independent, rather than being attached to other authorities. Regulations of Academic Committee in Universities issued by the Ministry of Education is undoubtedly a milestone, which means a shift of the academic committee from the period of system design into a new era of practical construction.

Key words: university governance, academic power, academic committee, system evolution