华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 38-49.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.12.004

• 基本理论与基本问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

谁更可能成功?中国、美国和芬兰基于核心素养的教育改革比较

邓莉1, 詹森云2   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学国际与比较教育研究所,上海 200062
    2. 南昌市红谷滩区教育体育局,江西 南昌 330038
  • 出版日期:2022-12-01 发布日期:2022-12-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题“中美竞争背景下美国教育战略及中国应对研究”(CDA220273)

Who is More Likely to Succeed: A Comparative Study of Competencies-based Education Reform in China, the United States and Finland

Li Deng1, Senyun Zhan2   

  1. 1. Institute of International and Comparative Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062
    2. Education and Sports Bureau of Honggutan District, Nanchang 330038
  • Online:2022-12-01 Published:2022-12-03

摘要:

基于核心素养的教育改革是一项全球教育政策,是世界各国为了应对社会变化与经济竞争、提高人才培养质量所推动的教育改革,其实施成功与否关涉到国家未来的劳动力素质、经济繁荣和全球竞争力。为了找到影响改革实施的主要因素和最可能成功的模式,本研究从政治承诺和实施能力两个方面,对中国、美国和芬兰三个具有代表性的基于核心素养的教育改革进行比较,指出中国的改革具备很强的政治承诺但实施能力不强;美国的改革实施能力强但不具备很强的政治承诺;芬兰的改革同时具备很强的政治承诺和实施能力,是一种更为理想的改革模式。中国可从评价方式、教师教育与培训以及教学与学习环境创新等方面借鉴芬兰和美国的经验,来提升改革的实施能力;继续维持政治承诺并将其转变成真正的执行力,将民间力量纳入改革主体之中,推动改革的成功实施。

关键词: 核心素养, 教育改革, 政治承诺, 实施能力, 民间力量

Abstract:

The education reform based on key competencies is a global education policy, promoted by most countries in the world to improve the quality of talent training in respond to social changes and economic competition. The success of its implementation is related to the country’s labour quality and economic prosperity, as well as global competitiveness. In order to find the main influencing factors and the model that would most likely lead to success of the reform’s implementation, this study compares the key competencies-based education reforms of China, the United States, and Finland from the perspectives of political commitment and implementation capacities. It then points out that, in terms of education reform, China has strong political commitment but not strong implementation capacities; the United States has strong reform implementation capacities but not strong political commitment; Finland has both strong political commitment and implementation capacities, which is a more ideal reform model. China could learn from the experience of Finland and the United States from the aspects of evaluation methods, teacher education and training, and innovation in teaching and learning environments to enhance the implementation capacities, meanwhile keep up the political commitment, transform it into execution, bring non-governmental actors into the reform and further promote the successful implementation of the reform.

Key words: key competencies, educational reform, political commitment, implementation capacities, non-governmental actors