华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 106-117.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.10.008

• 教育法治 • 上一篇    

教育治理的中国经验与政策组合创新

张万朋, 赵泽涛   

  1. 华东师范大学教育学部, 上海 200062
  • 出版日期:2026-10-01 发布日期:2026-09-28
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划项目国家重点项目“教育战略性投入机制的韧性评价与健全路径研究”(AGA250037)。

Educational Governance: The Chinese Experience and Innovation in Policy Mixes

Wanpeng Zhang, Zetao Zhao   

  1. East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-09-28

摘要:

教育治理现代化是国家治理体系与治理能力现代化的重要基石,事关教育强国战略的全局推进与中华民族伟大复兴的历史进程。研究立足于中国特色社会主义教育发展实践,聚焦政策组合这一研究视角,根据政策类型、政策工具的目标、方式、力度和范围系统梳理了“整体统筹与试点推进”“专项治理与相机治理”“逆周期与跨周期治理”“供给侧改革与需求侧管理”“长期规划与超长期规划”五大政策组合模式的实践探索,深入阐释了教育治理“中国经验”的实践逻辑与运行机制。进而发现,随着教育治理场域日趋复杂,缺乏系统整合的多元政策组合在实施过程中逐渐显露出结构性张力,主要表现为政策目标冲突、政策力度失衡、政策工具碎片化与政策评价标准不一等四维协同困境,制约了教育治理整体效能的提升。为破解政策组合的协同难题,研究构建了“稳定—发展—结构”三元协同的元治理框架,提出通过政策目标协同、政策力度适配、政策工具整合与政策评价融合四大机制,系统推动教育治理从“工具叠加”向“系统集成”的范式转型,为实现教育治理现代化提供理论依据与实践路径。

关键词: 教育治理, 中国经验, 政策组合

Abstract:

The modernization of educational governance serves as a crucial cornerstone of the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. It bears on the holistic advancement of the strategy for building a strong education nation and the historical process of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Based on the development practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the field of education, this study focuses on the research perspective of policy mixes. In accordance with the objectives, methods, intensity, and scope of different policy types and tools, it systematically sorts out the practical exploration of five major policy mix models: overall coordination and pilot advancement, special governance and contingent governance, counter-cyclical and cross-cyclical governance, supply-side structural reform and demand-side management, and long-term planning and ultra-long-term planning. Furthermore, it thoroughly elaborates on the practical logic and operational mechanism of the “Chinese experience” in educational governance. It is further found that as the educational governance landscape becomes increasingly complex, the implementation of diverse policy mixes lacking systematic integration has gradually exposed structural tensions. These tensions are mainly manifested in a four-dimensional coordination dilemma, including conflicts among policy objectives, imbalances in policy intensity, fragmentation of policy tools, and inconsistency in policy evaluation criteria, which have restricted the improvement of the overall effectiveness of educational governance. To address the coordination challenges of policy mixes, this study constructs a meta-governance framework of stability-development-structure ternary coordination, and proposes to systematically promote the paradigm shift of educational governance from “tool superposition” to “system integration” through four major mechanisms: policy objective coordination, policy intensity adaptation, policy tool integration, and policy evaluation integration, thereby providing theoretical basis and practical paths for realizing the modernization of educational governance.

Key words: educational governance, Chinese experience, policy mix