关于核心素养若干概念和命题的辨析

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.10.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着我国基础教育课程改革的推进，核心素养研究发展迅猛。同时也出现了一些认识或理解上的误区，如采用分析式的视角理解核心素养；将学科核心素养视为跨学科核心素养在特定领域的具体化；认为存在超越具体领域和情境的核心素养培养模式；秉承学习必须经过识记、理解和应用过程的观点等等。因此有必要从核心素养的内涵分析出发，突出整合的核心素养观对当前基础教育课程改革的重要性，从认识论、知识观和学习观的角度对上述观念的根源与弊端进行辨析，强调连接学生日常生活和社会实践的多样化真实情境在核心素养培养过程中的根本价值。核心素养的培养即孕育在教育过程中的学生成长性经验积累和改造的过程，是学生在经历完整的复杂现实问题解决过程中调动和整合人类文化工具、方法和资源建立起来的情境、观念和结果之间的内在联系和心智灵活性。

关键词: 核心素养, 学科核心素养, 情境, 学习观

Abstract: Emerging from the fast-growing discussions about key competences are a few misconceptions and improper claims.Some consider key competences as key abilities, essential characters or important values; some view domain-specific key competences as the decomposed lower-level realization of the cross-disciplinary key competences; others argue that key competences can be cultivated beyond any specific domain and situations and promoting competence development must go through the cognitive hierarchy as specified in Bloom’s taxonomy of learning outcome, etc. Such misconceptions or claims are primarily due to lack of proper understanding of the epistemology and conceptualization underlying the concept of key competence as well as the new learning perspectives it implies. This article discusses such issues critically based on the relevant theoretical perspectives.

Key words: key competence, domain-specific competence, situation, learning perspective

杨向东. 关于核心素养若干概念和命题的辨析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(10): 48-59.

Yang Xiangdong. On the Misconceptions about Key Competences[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(10): 48-59.

参考文献

崔允漷, 邵朝友. (2017). 试论核心素养的课程意义. 全球教育展望,46(10),24-33
杜威. (2004). 我们怎样思维(姜文闵译). 北京: 人民教育出版社.
杜威. (2012). 民主与教育(俞吾金, 孔慧译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
核心素养研究课题组. (2016). 中国学生发展核心素养. 中国教育学刊,10,1-3
马斯·德里斯科尔. (2004). 学习心理学(王小明等译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
杨向东. (2017). 基于核心素养的基础教育课程标准研制. 全球教育展望,46(10),34-48
杨向东. (2018). 以科学探究为例看素养与知识的关系. 基础教育课程,191(2),19-23
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). 行为主义、认知主义和建构主义(下)——从教学设计的视角比较其关键特征(盛群力译). 电化教育研究, 132(4), 27-31
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439-476
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Guguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42
Byrnes, J. P., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). The nature and development of critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 477-493
Chiappe, D., & MacDonald, K. (2005). The Evolution of Domain-General Mechanisms in Intelligence and Learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(1), 5-40
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, NE: Mouton.
Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529-544
Delamare le Deist, F., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence?. Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27-46
Elkin, G. (1990). Competency-based human resource development. Industrial and Commercial Training, 22(4), 20-25
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 179-186
Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28(5), 401-416
European Commission. Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency and Eurydice (2012). Developing key competences at school in Europe: challenges and opportunities for policy [online]. Available: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/145EN.pdf.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. Eric Document Reproduction Service.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology, 2(4), 290-309
Gallagher, S. A. (2015). The role of problem-based learning in developing creative expertise. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 16(2), 225-235
Glaser, E. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: the role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93-104
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht, NE: Springer.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455
Hassebrock, F., & Prietula, M. J. (1992). A protocol-based coding scheme for the analysis of medical reasoning. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37(5), 613-652
Hoffman, T. (1999). The meaning of competency. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 275-285
Hoskins, B., & Crick, R. D. (2010). Competences for learning to learn and active citizenship: different currencies or two sides of the same coin?. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 121-137
Klieme, E. et al., (2004). The development of national educational standard: An expertise. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Publication and website Division, D-11055 Berlin, German. Retrieved Nov 20, 2009 from http://www.bmbf.de.
Kruse, J., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1987). A catalog of programs for teaching thinking. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-25
Lawson, A. E., & Hegebush, W. (1985). A survey of causal hypothesis testing strategies: K-12. American Biology Teacher, 47(6), 348-355
Lerner, B. (1981). The minimum competence testing movement: social, scientific and legal implications. American Psychologist, 36(10), 1057-1066
Lim et al., (2015). Cultivating a remix movement in an East Asian culture. In. Y. H. Cho., I. S. Caleon, & M. Kapur (Eds.), Authentic problem solving and learning in the 21st century (P. 155−172). Singapore: Springer.
Linn, M. C. (1990). What constitutes scientific thinking?. Contemporary Psychology, 35(1), 16-17
MacKinnon, D. W. (1966). What makes a person creative?. Theory Into Practice, 5(4), 152-156
Moore, T. (2011). Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: A continuing debate. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 261-274
Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464-479
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: Naitonal Academy Press, available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html.
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies, Executive summary. Paris, France: OECD.
Palinscar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375
Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: a dispositional theory of thinking. Merril-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 1-21
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context bound?. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(2), 126-137
Qian, M., Plucker, J. A., & Yang, X. (2019). Evidence of the psychometric integrity of the creative personality scale using item response theory models. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1647758. Available online 04 Aug, 2019
Royce, J. R., & Rozeboom, W. W. (1972). The Psychology of Knowing. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 657-687
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Rychen, S., & Salagnick, L. (2003). A holistic model of competence. In. S. Rychen. & L. Salagnick (Eds.), Key competences for a successful life and a well-functioning society (P. 41−62). Göttingen, NE: Hogrefe & Huber.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388
Sloutsky, V. M. (2010). Mechanisms of cognitive development: domain-general learning or domain-specific constraints?. Cognitive Science, 34(7), 1125-1130
Stasz, C. (1997). Do employers need the skills they want? Evidence from technical work. Journal of Education and Work, 10(3), 205-233
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). How can we teach intelligence?. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 38-48
Sternberg, R. J., & Kastoor, B. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effectiveness of intellectual skills programs: Snake oil remedies or miracle cures?. Educational Leadership, 44(2), 60-67
Sternberg, R. J., & Kolligian, J. Jr. (1990). Competence considered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688
Tiruneh, D. T. et al. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Education Technology Research, 64(3), 481-505
US partnership for 21st century skills. (2014). Framework for 21st century learning [online]. Available at http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework.
Van Aken, M. A. G. (1992). The development of general competence and domain-specific competencies. European Journal of Personality, 6(4), 267-282
Weinert, F. E. (1999). Concept of competence. Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundation (DeSeCo). OECD, Paris.
White, R. H. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333

[1]	余秀兰. 文化资本与教育获得：中国情境中的探索与创新[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(6): 20-37.
[2]	崔允漷, 周文叶, 雷浩, 郭洪瑞, 张紫红, 王少非, 安桂清, 吴刚平. 中国基础教育课程改革学术话语体系的自主建构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(11): 154-170.
[3]	于泽元, 那明明. 情境化学习：内涵、价值及实施[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(1): 89-97.
[4]	邓莉, 詹森云. 谁更可能成功？中国、美国和芬兰基于核心素养的教育改革比较[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(12): 38-49.
[5]	杨向东. 作为理论构念的素养及其模型构建[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(11): 41-57.
[6]	郑鑫, 刘源, 尹弘飚. 文化与情境是如何影响教师学习的？——以中国教师学习共同体研究为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(10): 29-41.
[7]	阎琨, 吴菡, 张雨颀. 社会责任感：拔尖人才的核心素养[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(12): 28-41.
[8]	魏锐, 刘坚, 白新文, 马晓英, 刘妍, 马利红, 甘秋玲, 康翠萍, 徐冠兴. “21世纪核心素养5C模型”研究设计[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 20-28.
[9]	刘妍, 马晓英, 刘坚, 魏锐, 马利红, 徐冠兴, 康翠萍, 甘秋玲. 文化理解与传承素养：21世纪核心素养5C模型之一[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 29-44.
[10]	马利红, 魏锐, 刘坚, 马鸣燕, 刘妍, 甘秋玲, 康翠萍, 徐冠兴. 审辨思维：21世纪核心素养5C模型之二[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 45-56.
[11]	甘秋玲, 白新文, 刘坚, 魏锐, 马利红, 徐冠兴, 刘妍, 康翠萍. 创新素养：21世纪核心素养5C模型之三[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 57-70.
[12]	康翠萍, 徐冠兴, 魏锐, 刘坚, 郑琰, 刘妍, 甘秋玲, 马利红. 沟通素养：21世纪核心素养5C模型之四[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 71-82.
[13]	徐冠兴, 魏锐, 刘坚, 李静懿, 康翠萍, 马利红, 甘秋玲, 刘妍. 合作素养：21世纪核心素养5C模型之五[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 83-96.
[14]	雷万鹏, 王浩文. 真实情境中教师的差异化行为:S县“联校走教”政策十年观察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(4): 129-141.
[15]	张华. 论学科核心素养——兼论信息时代的学科教育[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(1): 55-65+166+167.