华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 40-52.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.05.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

理性主义的教育法法典化:理想与现实之间

彭宇文   

  1. 武汉大学教育科学研究院, 武汉 430072
  • 接受日期:2022-02-21 出版日期:2022-05-01 发布日期:2022-04-27
  • 基金资助:
    国家教育考试科研规划2019年度重点课题“依法治考的理论与实践研究”(GJK2019001)

Rationalist Codification of Education Law: Between Ideals and Reality

Yuwen Peng   

  1. Institute of Education Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Accepted:2022-02-21 Online:2022-05-01 Published:2022-04-27

摘要:

法典化是中国特色社会主义法治建设的重要举措,教育法典作为中国特色社会主义法律体系的有机组成部分,打造教育发展的宪章、彰显教育法典的民族风格、弘扬中国特色教育法治精神,进而形成教育法典的中国气质,必然成为法典化的理想追求。但理想与现实尚存差距,我国教育法典编纂虽有一定基础,却依然面临着教育法律体系建设尚不够成熟、教育法地位问题尚存在争议、教育法治建设实践发展尚不平衡、教育事业改革发展尚有诸多不确定因素、教育法学元理论建设尚存不足等现实困境,挑战难度极高。面对挑战,教育法典编纂必须有机平衡理想与现实的关系,实行“理性主义思路”,从务实导向、问题导向和培育有机生长的良性生态方面打牢思想基础,以高成熟度的学术研究为支撑、以高包容度的舆论导向为支持夯实理论基础,实施“过渡性法典化”策略,发挥立法机关和学术力量等方面的协同作用,在法典体例结构、立法技术上体现发展导向,推进教育法典编纂的实施。

关键词: 教育法治建设, 法典化, 教育法, 教育法典编纂, 理性主义

Abstract:

Codification is an important measure for the construction of the socialist law with Chinese characteristics. As an organic part of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, the codification of education law inevitably pursues creating a charter for educational development, highlighting national features, promoting the spirit of education law with Chinese characteristics, and ultimately forming the Chinese qualities of education code. However, there is still a gap between ideals and reality. Although the codification of education law in China has a certain foundation, there are still a series of highly challenging dilemmas, including a lack of mature construction of education legal system, the controversial status of education law, the imbalanced development of educational legal construction practice, the uncertainty of the factors for the reform and development of education, and the deficiencies of developing meta-theories of educational law. To address these issues, the compilation of the educational code must balance the relationship between ideals and reality and implement “rationalist thinking”. We should not only lay an ideological foundation from pragmatic and problem-oriented perspectives, and the perspective of cultivating a benign development ecology, but also consolidate a theoretical foundation supported by highly mature academic research and an inclusive public opinion orientation. The article advocates to implement the strategy of “transitional codification”, to improve the synergy of legislature and academic forces, to steer toward future directions through the structure of the code and legislative techniques, and to reinforce the implementation of the codification of educational code.

Key words: construction of education law, codification, education law, codification of education law, rationalism