ChatGPT/生成式人工智能重塑教育的底层逻辑和可能路径

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.07.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

ChatGPT 作为基于通用人工智能的大模型，提供生成式的信息获取服务，功能远远超过以往的任何检索、搜索工具，它的出现也必将对教育产生深刻影响。文章通过文献研究等方法，分析了ChatGPT对教育的影响方式，从脑科学、知识观、教育元认知视角分析了它重塑教育的底层逻辑，并提出了它重塑教育的可能路径。文章认为：ChatGPT 对教育的影响主要将在传统教育工具的有效性、知识价值论、资源形态、学习模型、评价手段和人机协同智商等领域深刻改变教育，其改变教育符合脑科学的本质，并与知识观呼应，也符合教育价值观。ChatGPT的诞生催生了新的教育形态，未来需要加速构建人机协同智商、教育评价系统和基于计算的教学策略模型，加速人类教育模式的革命性重塑。

关键词: ChatGPT, 人机协同智商, 生成式人工智能, 教育评价, google效应, 知识观, 脑科学

Abstract:

As a large model based on general artificial intelligence, ChatGPT can provide generative information acquisition services, and its functions far exceed any previous retrieval and search tools. Its appearance will also have a profound impact on education. This paper analyzes the influence of ChatGPT on education through literature research and other methods, analyzes and demonstrates its underlying logic of reshaping education from the perspective of brain science, knowledge view, and educational metacognition, and proposes its possible path to reshape education. The article believes that the impact of ChatGPT on education will mainly change education profoundly in the fields of the effectiveness of traditional educational tools, knowledge value theory, resource form, learning model, evaluation methods, and human-machine collaboration IQ. Its change in education conforms to the essence of brain science, echoes with the concept of knowledge, and also conforms to educational values. The birth of ChatGPT gave birth to a new form of education. In the future, it is necessary to accelerate the construction of human-computer collaborative IQ, educational evaluation systems, and computing-based teaching strategy models, and accelerate the revolutionary reshaping of human education.

Key words: ChatGPT, human-computer collaborative intelligence, AIGC, educational evaluation, google effect, knowledge view, brain science

张治. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能重塑教育的底层逻辑和可能路径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 131-142.

Zhi Zhang. ChatGPT/AIGC Reshape Education: Underlying Logic and Possible Paths[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(7): 131-142.

图/表 5

参考文献 0

	艾培炎记忆能够遗传吗? 科学世界 2020 261 11 123 123 艾培炎. (2020). 记忆能够遗传吗?. 科学世界,261(11),123—123.
	冯永刚, 陈颖智慧教育时代教师角色的“变”与“不变” 中国电化教育 2021 4 8 15 冯永刚, 陈颖. (2021). 智慧教育时代教师角色的“变”与“不变”. 中国电化教育,(4),8—15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2021.04.002
	吴砥, 李环, 尉小荣教育数字化转型: 国际背景、发展需求与推进路径中国远程教育 2022 42 7 21 27,58,79 吴砥, 李环, 尉小荣. (2022). 教育数字化转型: 国际背景、发展需求与推进路径. 中国远程教育,42(7),21—27,58,79.
	新民晚报. (2023). ChatGPT把教育逼到了墙角?长三角校长院长和大咖这么说. [2023−02−20]. 取自: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1758348264458677880&wfr=spider&for=pc.
	新智元. (2018). 《生命3.0》作者泰格马克: 人类和AI, 谁是终极操纵者?. [2018−10−4]. 取自: https://www.163.com/dy/article/DT9FIBB80511ABV6.html.
	知识分子. (2023). ChatGPT对人类社会最为根本的改变, 将发生在教育领域. [2023−03−28]. 取自: https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20230328A00OXE00.
	Claybourn, C. (2023). ChatGPT in Classrooms: What to Know. [2023−02−16]. Retrieved from https://www.usn ews.com/education/best-high-schools/articles/ChatGPT-in-classrooms-what-to-know.
	Euchner, J Almost human Research-Technology Management 2023 66 2 10 11 Euchner, J. (2023). Almost human. Research-Technology Management, 66(2), 10—11. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2023.2164831
	Kosinski, M. (2023). Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models. ArXiv, abs/2302.02083.
	Lipman, J., Distler R. (2023). Schools Shouldn’t Ban Access to ChatGPT. [2023−2−16]. Retrieved from https://time.com/6246574/schools-shouldnt-ban-access-to-ChatGPT/.
	OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. [2022−11−30]. Retrieved from https://openai.com/blog/ChatGPT/.
	Sevilla, J., Heim, L., Ho, A. C., Besiroglu, T., Hobbhahn, M., &Villalobos, P. (2022). Compute trends across three eras of machine learning. 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1—8.
	Tamkin, A., Brundage, M., Clark, J., & Ganguli, D. (2021). Understanding the apabilities, limitations, and societal impact of large language models. ArXiv, abs/2102.02503.
	Topsakal, O., & Topsakal, E Framework for a foreign language teaching software for children utilizing AR, voicebots and ChatGPT (Large Language Models) The Journal of Cognitive Systems 2023 7 2 33 38 Topsakal, O., & Topsakal, E. (2023). Framework for a foreign language teaching software for children utilizing AR, voicebots and ChatGPT (Large Language Models). The Journal of Cognitive Systems, 7(2), 33—38.
	Wan, J. ChatGPT is scary good at my job, but there’s one reason I’m not panicking. [2023−02−20]. Retrieved from https://www.zdnet.com/article/ChatGPT-is-scary-good-at-my-job-but-theres -one-reason-im-not-panicking/.
	Williamson, B., Macgilchrist, F., & Potter, J Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning Media and Technology 2023 48 1 1 5 Williamson, B., Macgilchrist, F., & Potter, J. (2023). Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning. Media and Technology, 48(1), 1—5.

[1]	朱永新, 杨帆. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能与教育创新：机遇、挑战以及未来[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 1-14.
[2]	陈玉琨. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能时代的教育变革[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 103-116.
[3]	顾小清, 胡艺龄, 郝祥军. AGI临近了吗：ChatGPT热潮之下再看人工智能与未来教育发展[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 117-130.
[4]	刘骥, 张晋. 国际学生评估项目（PISA）衍生品：全球教育治理的功利化挑战[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(2): 53-62.
[5]	杨欣. 教育评价改革的算法追问[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(1): 19-29.
[6]	周作宇. 论教育评价的治理功能及其自反性立场[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(8): 1-19.
[7]	谢晨, 尹弘飚. 教师视角下教研工作质量与发展均衡程度的省际比较[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(5): 55-67.
[8]	赵勇. 教育评价的几大问题及发展方向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 1-14.
[9]	王竹立. 新知识观:重塑面向智能时代的教与学[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(5): 38-55.
[10]	冯友梅, 李艺. 布鲁姆教育目标分类学批判[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 63-72.
[11]	陶西平,顾海良,张力,杨东平,谢小庆,赵中建,庞维国. 《每一个学生都成功法》七人谈[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2016, 34(2): 1-15.
[12]	沈玉顺. 中招考试制度改革若干政策问题分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(3): 26-30.
[13]	陈爱国,颜军,赵峰. 体育与国民素质提升：来自脑科学的新证据[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(2): 63-68.
[14]	戚业国, 杜瑛. 教育价值的多元与教育评价范式的转变[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2011, 29(2): 11-18.
[15]	周加仙. 神经神话"的成因分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2008, 26(3): 60-64, 83.