华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 86-96.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.12.007

• 中国教育学自主知识体系建构 • 上一篇    下一篇

高等教育国际化概念重审:西方概念霸权与多元知识体系的构建

杨锐, 杨力苈   

  1. 香港大学教育学院,香港 999077
  • 出版日期:2025-12-01 发布日期:2025-11-27
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目“高层次人才海外引进与本土培养对中国大学国际影响力提升的作用机制和对策研究”(72304233);香港研究资助局一般资助项目“全球知识体系中的香港人文社科研究”(17607724)。

Re-examining the Concept of Internationalization in Higher Education: Western Conceptual Hegemony and the Construction of Diverse Knowledge Systems

rui Yang, lili Yang   

  1. The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • Online:2025-12-01 Published:2025-11-27

摘要:

自高等教育国际化概念出现以来,以简·奈特的定义为代表的所谓“主流”定义逐渐发展成全球范围内高等教育国际化的“规范”,成为指导高等教育国际化理论探讨和实践的重要依据。然而,这些定义发展于西方语境,只能较为单一地反映出西方视角下的高等教育国际化,不仅难以包容不同社会、院校和历史阶段对国际化的多元理解与要求,限制非西方社会高等教育发展的活力和想象力,还具有其内在的局限性,特别是对知识体系国际化的忽略。本文将围绕多元文化、特别是中西文化间的互动对当前高等教育国际化概念进行反思,立足我国知识传统,从构建融会多元知识体系的高等教育出发,对国际化概念进行重构,并强调我国知识与文化传统能够对世界高等教育乃至人类文明发展做出巨大贡献的责任与潜力。

关键词: 高等教育国际化, 中西文化互动, 知识体系, 思想与知识多元, 全球化

Abstract:

Since the introduction of the concept of internationalization in higher education, the so-called “mainstream” definitions of it, represented by Jane Knight’s definition, have gradually developed into the “norm” of higher education internationalization on a global scale, and have become a key reference in the theoretical discussion and practice of internationalization in higher education. However, as these definitions were developed in the Western context, they only reflect the internationalization of higher education from Western perspectives, and are thus narrow. It is difficult to accommodate them for the de facto diverse understandings and requirements of internationalization in different countries and higher education institutions, and at different historical stages. These definitions are also restricting the potential and imagination of non-Western higher education systems. Furthermore, these definitions have intrinsic limitations, including their ignorance of the internationalization of knowledge. With a special focus on the interactions between multiple cultures, especially between Chinese and Western cultures, this paper reflects on the existing connotations of internationalization in higher education. It draws upon Chinese intellectual traditions and highlights intellectual pluralism in higher education as an essential aspect of higher education internationalization. It also underlines the responsibility and potential of Chinese intellectual and cultural traditions in contributing to the development of global higher education and human civilization.

Key words: internationalization of higher education, Chinese-Western cultural interaction, knowledge system, intellectual pluralism, globalization