基于共同体准则的治理：工程教育认证的理论源流与实践走向

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

工程教育认证是世界上工程教育质量保障的最重要方式之一。作为一项准则参照的同行评价制度，工程教育认证体系中始终隐含着包括政府、大学、工业界等在内的利益攸关者之间的多重张力关系。而平衡协调这些关系的过程，也是基于共同体准则的工程教育治理过程。本文从理论起源、方法转向、准则参照、制度演化四个方面回顾了工程教育认证的百年发展历程，并结合国际工程联盟（IEA）《毕业要求与职业胜任力（GAPC）》国际基准框架的修订工作，对工程教育认证的未来发展趋势进行了展望。

关键词: 工程教育认证, 准则参照, 治理

Abstract:

Accreditation of engineering education is one of the most important ways of quality assurance of engineering education in the world. As a criterion-referenced peer evaluation system, multiple tensions among stakeholders, including government, universities, and industry, are always implied in the engineering education accreditation system. Based on community criterion, the process of balancing and coordinating these tensions is also the process of governance of engineering education. This paper reviews the century-long development of engineering education accreditation from four aspects: theoretical origins, methodological shift, criterion-referenced logic, and institutional evolution, and makes an outlook on the future development trend of engineering education accreditation in the light of the revision of the international benchmark framework of Graduation Attributes and Professional Competencies (GAPC) of the International Engineering Alliance (IEA).

Key words: engineering education accreditation, criterion-referenced, governance

乔伟峰, 王玉佳, 王孙禺. 基于共同体准则的治理：工程教育认证的理论源流与实践走向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(8): 9-18.

Weifeng Qiao, Yujia Wang, Sunyu Wang. Governance Based on Community Criterion: Theoretical Origins and Practical Directions of Engineering Education Accreditation[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(8): 9-18.

参考文献 0

	王沛民. (2018−11−08). 王沛民: 工学论随想. 高等工程教育研究. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/levSnp_s7jxxhul-SqsS0A.
	Akera, A. (2006). The practice and discursive constructions of engineering education reform: ASEE Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education, 1952-1955. In Proc. Int’l Network for Eng. Studies Fall 2016 Workshop: Locating Engineering: Education, Knowledge, Desire.
	Akera, A., Appelhans, S., Cheville, A., Pree, T. D., Fatehiboroujeni, S., Karlin, L. & Riley, D. (2019). ABET & Engineering Accreditation - History, Theory, Practice: Initial Findings from a National Study on the Governance of Engineering Education. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
	Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
	ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) . (1987). A National Action Agenda for Engineering Education. Report of an ASEE Task Force. Washington, D.C.: ASEE.
	Augusti, G. (2009). EUR-ACE: The European accreditation system of engineering education and its global context. In Engineering education quality assurance. Springer, Boston, MA. pp.41—49.
	Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. (ED053419). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED053419.pdf.
	Brandt, R. (1994). Foreword comments from the field. In Spady, W.G., Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. (pp.iii-v). American Association of School Administrators, 1801 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209.
	ENAEE (The European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education). (2021). About. Retrieved August 20, 2021, from https://www.enaee.eu/about-enaee/.
	ENAEE. (2022a). Structure of ENAEE. Retrieved Feb 20, 2022, from https://www.enaee.eu/about-enaee/structure-of-enaee/#ENAEE-member-organisations.
	ENAEE. (2022b). EUR-ACE Label Authorisation Process -Labels awarded Dec 31 2021. Retrieved Feb 20, 2022, from https://www.enaee.eu/eur-ace-system/awarding-eur-ace-label//#EUR-ACE-labels-status.
	FEAINI（The European Federation of National Engineering Associations）. (2013). Guide to the FEANI EUR ING Register. https://www.feani.org/sites/default/files/Guide_to_the_Register_FINAL_approved_GA_2013.pdf.
	FEIAP（Federation of Engineering Institutions of Asia and the Pacific）. （2022）. FEIAP Accreditation list. Retrieved Feb 20, 2022, from http://www.feiap.org/accreditation-list.
	IEA (International Engineering Alliance). (2014). 25 years of the Washington Accord. https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf. 11−13.
	Glaser, R Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice 1994 13 4 6 8 Glaser, R. (1994). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 13(4), 6—8.
	Grinter, L. E. (1955). Report of the Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education (Grinter Report). Journal of Engineering Education, 44(3), pp. 25−60.
	McClelland, D. C Testing for competence rather than for intelligence American Psychologist 1973 28 1 1 McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1. doi: 10.1037/h0034092
	McClelland, D. C. (1988). Human motivation. United States: Cambridge University Press.
	McClelland, D. C Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews Psychological Science 1998 9 5 331 339 McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331—339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00065
	Mowery, D. C Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge Science 1989 246 4937 1642 1644 Mowery, D. C. (1989). Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge. Science, 246(4937), 1642—1644. doi: 10.1126/science.246.4937.1642
	National Commission on Excellence in Education A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform The Elementary School Journal 1983 84 2 113 130 National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 113—130. doi: 10.1086/461348
	NRC (National Research Council). (1985). Engineering education and practice in the United States: Foundations of our techno-economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
	NSB（National Science Board）. （1987）. Task Committee on Undergraduate Science, Engineering Education. 1987. Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education: Source materials, Vol. 2.
	Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R Quality assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence Journal of Engineering Education 2005 94 1 166,168 Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 166,168.
	Seely, B. E European contributions to American engineering education: Blending old and new QUADERNS D’HISTÒRIA DE L’ENGINYERIA 1999 3 11 29 Seely, B. E. (1999). European contributions to American engineering education: Blending old and new. QUADERNS D’HISTÒRIA DE L’ENGINYERIA, 3, 11—29.
	Spady, W. G. (1982). Outcome-based instructional management: A sociological perspective. Australian Journal of Education. 26(2): 123−143.
	Spady, W.G. (1994) .Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, pp. 2, 6−8.
	Spencer, L. M., McClelland, D. C., & Spencer, S. M. (1994). Competency assessment methods: History and state of the art. S. L.: Hay McBer Research Press.
	Stephan, K. D. (2001). All this and engineering too: History of accreditation requirements for nontechnical curriculum content in US Engineering Education 1933-2000. Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society. 155−156.
	Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. p.1.
	Volkwein, J. F., Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P., Strauss, L. C., & Sukhbaatar, J Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000 International Journal of Engineering Education 2004 20 318 328 Volkwein, J. F., Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P., Strauss, L. C., & Sukhbaatar, J. (2004). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 318—328.
	White, R. W Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence Psychological Review 1959 66 5,297 333 White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 5,297—333.
	Willenbrock, K. (1989). Imperatives in Undergraduate Engineering Education: Issues and Actions. Report of an NSF Ad Hoc Task Force.

[1]	田凤. 后真相时代教育舆情研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(3): 30-39.
[2]	李立国, 冯鹏达. 从学科建设到学科治理：基于松散耦合理论的考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(2): 90-99.
[3]	俞蕖. 大学评估何处去？国际评估在中国一流大学的兴起、扩散与制度化[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(1): 30-42.
[4]	周作宇. 论教育评价的治理功能及其自反性立场[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(8): 1-19.
[5]	杨文杰, 范国睿. 突破藩篱：高水平推进教育治理现代化的战略选择[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(8): 94-106.
[6]	魏叶美, 范国睿. 教师参与学校治理意愿影响因素的实证研究——计划行为理论框架下的分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 73-82.
[7]	李立国. 大学治理的制度逻辑：融通“大学之制”与“大学之治”[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(3): 1-13.
[8]	姚荣. 告别自治：合规时代的美国大学治理[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(2): 75-88.
[9]	陈亮. 论大学学术治理能力现代化[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(2): 89-99.
[10]	周光礼, 郭卉. 大学治理实证研究2015—2019：特征、趋势与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(9): 200-227.
[11]	林克松, 朱德全. 教育应对公共危机的分析框架与行动范式——基于“新冠”重大疫情危机的透视[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(4): 118-126.
[12]	眭依凡. 关于高校内部治理体系创新研究的框架性思考[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(12): 21-32.
[13]	朱剑. 西方大学内部治理模式的嬗变：从学院式走向创业型[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(1): 85-96.
[14]	杨蓉, 王雯, 刘婷婷. 大学治理、财务管理与价值增值关系研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(6): 83-93.
[15]	李立国. 什么是好的大学治理:治理的“实然”与“应然”分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(5): 1-16.