华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 132-146.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.01.011

• 教育法治 • 上一篇    

中国教育法学自主知识体系构建的底层逻辑

刘遇择, 陈恩伦   

  1. 西南大学教师教育学院,重庆 400715
  • 接受日期:2025-11-25 出版日期:2026-01-01 发布日期:2025-12-31

The Underlying Logic of Constructing the Independent Knowledge System of Education Law in China

Yuze Liu, Enlun Chen   

  1. College of Teacher Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Accepted:2025-11-25 Online:2026-01-01 Published:2025-12-31

摘要:

在全球知识格局深刻变革、中国自主知识体系构建需求日益凸显的背景下,教育法学作为研究教育法律现象及其规律的交叉学科,其自主知识体系的构建对正确把握教育的政治属性、人民属性、战略属性,提升教育治理能力和治理体系现代化,具有重要的现实意义。构建中国教育法学自主知识体系旨在摆脱西方理论束缚,以更适应中国国情的方式解决本土教育问题,其基础在于清晰界定其底层逻辑,即教育逻辑、法律逻辑与价值逻辑。教育逻辑立足于中国教育的根本属性,阐明教育法学必须服务于“为党育人、为国育才”的根本使命,保障教育优先发展,并坚持以人民为中心的价值导向。法律逻辑聚焦于知识体系的内在结构与运行机制,深入剖析宪法统摄下的教育主体权利内涵,论证从“部门法”转向“领域法”的体系整合范式以应对终身教育时代的复杂治理需求,并强调通过“双轮驱动”模式实现教育治理的在地化转型。价值逻辑致力于回应教育实践中多元价值之间的内在张力,探索价值冲突的动态调适方法与平衡路径。这三大逻辑相互关联、层层递进,共同构成了一个兼具理论自洽性、实践指导性与价值引领性的完整框架,为中国教育法学自主知识体系的深化与创新奠定了坚实基础。

关键词: 教育法学, 自主知识体系, 底层逻辑

Abstract:

Against the backdrop of profound transformations in the global knowledge landscape and the growing urgency to construct China’s independent knowledge system, educational jurisprudence—an interdisciplinary field dedicated to studying the phenomena and laws of educational law—bears significant practical importance in building its own independent knowledge system. This endeavor is crucial for accurately grasping education’s political, people-centered, and strategic attributes, as well as advancing the modernization of educational governance capacity and governance systems.The construction of an independent knowledge system for Chinese educational jurisprudence aims to break free from the constraints of Western theories and address local educational issues in a way that better aligns with China’s national conditions, and its foundation lies in clearly defining its underlying logics: the educational logic, legal logic, and value logic. The educational logic, rooted in the fundamental attributes of Chinese education, clarifies that educational jurisprudence must serve the core mission of “nurturing talents for the Party and the nation,”safeguard the priority of educational development, and adhere to the people-centered value orientation. The legal logic focuses on the internal structure and operational mechanism of the knowledge system. It conducts in-depth analysis of the connotation of educational subjects’ rights under the guidance of the Constitution, demonstrates the systemic integration paradigm shifting from “branch law”to “domain law” to meet the complex governance needs of the lifelong education era, and emphasizes the realization of localized transformation in educational governance through a “dual-drive” model. The value logic is committed to addressing the inherent tensions among diverse values in educational practice and exploring dynamic adjustment methods and balancing paths for resolving value conflicts. These three interrelated and progressive logics together form a comprehensive framework characterized by theoretical consistency, practical guidance, and value leadership, laying a solid foundation for the deepening and innovation of the independent knowledge system of Chinese educational jurisprudence.

Key words: education law, independent knowledge system, underlying logic