与破局共舞的防灾教育：传承灾害与灾祸记忆的教育尝试

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.10.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

反映社会结构脆弱性的自然灾害与社会灾祸，可以被理解为引发个体或群体所处生活领域与社会基础破坏性动摇的、在事件发生之前不可想象的社会现象，而灾害与灾祸记忆就是人们对该过去发生现象的回忆与再认。对人而言，灾害与灾祸记忆是给予人以身份的存在之根，是具有警示作用的后事之师，是带来生成契机的意外之局，是光大求真之心的斗争之所。但是对个体的生成至关重要的该记忆却被扎根于现实生活的、排斥不确定性的现代教育整体性地遗忘了。对灾害与灾祸记忆的传承逐渐被形式化的灾害纪念与知识化的防灾教育所取代。事实上，重视传承灾害与灾祸记忆的防灾教育不仅是帮助个体成为幸存者的自助教育，也是促使个体成为志愿者的共助教育。在情感共鸣与真挚对话的作用下，曾经共同回忆和再认某一灾害或灾祸的人们建构起彼此间的联结，共同面对未来可能再临的全新破局。借传承记忆之便，行共感对话之举，达他者共舞之功，成破局重生之事，此为新防灾教育之旨。

关键词: 灾害与灾祸记忆, 防灾教育, 现代教育批判, 生成

Abstract:

Natural disasters and social disasters can be understood as the phenomena that lead to the destructive shaking of people’s life field and social foundation. And the memory of catastrophe is people’s recollection and recognition of the past phenomenon. For people, the memory of catastrophe is the basis that gives people identities, the wake-up call for survivor, the accident that brings the chance, the place of debate for seeking truth. However, the memory, which is essential to the bildung of individuals, has been completely forgotten by modern education, which is rooted in real life and repels uncertainty. The inheritance of memory is gradually replaced by formal commemoration and knowledge-based disaster prevention education. In fact, disaster prevention education that attaches importance to inheriting the memory of catastrophe is not only self-help education that helps students become survivors, but also co-help education that makes students become volunteers. Under the effect of emotional resonance and sincere dialogue, people who recognized the catastrophe together build a connection, in order to face a new catastrophe that may come again in the future.

Key words: memory of catastrophe, disaster prevention education, modern education criticism, bildung

虞嘉琦. 与破局共舞的防灾教育：传承灾害与灾祸记忆的教育尝试[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(10): 77-90.

Jiaqi Yu. Disaster Prevention Education: An Educational Attempt to Inherit Memory of Catastrophe[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(10): 77-90.

参考文献 0

	阿斯曼. (2015). 文化记忆: 早期高级文化中的文字、回忆和政治身份(金寿福, 黄晓晨译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	巴迪欧. (2020). 追寻消失的真实(宋德超译). 南宁: 广西人民出版社.
	鲍德里亚. (2014). 消费社会(刘成富, 全志钢译). 南京: 南京大学出版社.
	鲍曼. (2018). 怀旧的乌托邦(姚伟等译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
	贝克. (2018). 风险社会: 新的现代性之路(张文杰, 何博译). 南京: 译林出版社.
	比斯塔. (2018). 教育的美丽风险(赵康译). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
	柏格森. (2018). 物质与记忆(姚晶晶译). 北京: 时代华文书局.
	陈晓明. (2009). 德里达的底线——解构的要义与新人文学的到来. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	德里达. (1999). 论文字学(汪堂家译). 上海: 上海译文出版社.
	格里. (2018). 历史、记忆与书写(罗新译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	哈贝马斯. (2004). 交往行为理论·第一卷(曹卫东译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
	贺萧. (2017). 记忆的性别: 农村妇女和中国集体化历史(张赟译). 北京: 人民出版社.
	霍布斯鲍姆, 兰杰. (2020). 传统的发明(顾杭, 庞冠群译). 南京: 译林出版社.
	勒普顿. (2016). 风险(雷云飞译). 南京: 南京大学出版社.
	利科. (2018). 记忆, 历史, 遗忘(李彦岑, 陈颖译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
	陆扬. (2008). 德里达的幽灵. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社.
	罗威廉. (2014). 红雨: 一个中国县域七个世纪的暴力史(李里峰译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
	米歇尔, 汉森. (2019). 媒介研究批判术语集(肖腊梅, 胡晓华译). 南京: 南京大学出版社.
	奈曼. (2016). 为什么长大(刘建芳译). 上海: 上海文艺出版社.
	诺拉. (2020). 记忆之场: 法国国民意识的文化社会史(黄艳红等译). 南京: 南京大学出版社.
	齐泽克. (2016). 事件(王师译). 上海: 上海文艺出版社.
	舒斯特曼. (2020). 通过身体来思考(张宝贵译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	闫国疆. (2016). 他者的游弋与自我的构建: 西域-新疆居民身份认同的历史流变. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
	张一兵. (2006). 德里达: 不在场幽灵的激进在场——《马克思的幽灵》的文本学解读. 马克思主义与现实, (1), 86- 92.
	Abel, M., Berntsen, D. (2021). How do we remember public events? Pioneering a new area of everyday memory research. Cognition, 214, 1- 19.
	Bankoff, G., Newhall, C. & Schrikker, A. (2021). The charmed circle: mobility, identity and memory around Mount Mayon (Philippines) and Gunung Awu (Indonesia) Volcanoes. Human Ecology, 49, 147- 158. doi: 10.1007/s10745-021-00225-0
	Berger, S., Lorenz, C. (2010). Introduction. In Berger, S. , Lorenz, C. (Ed. ). Nationalizing the past: Historians as nation builders in modern Europe . Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Berlowitz, S. (2016). Unequal equals: How politics can block empathy. In Assmann, A. , Detmers, I. (Ed. ). Empathy and its limits. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Bond, L. (2015). Frames of memory after 9/11: Culture, criticism, politics, and law. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Browning, C. R., Heschel, S., Marrus, M. R., & Shain, M. (2015). Introduction. In Browning, C. R. , Heschel, S. , Marrus, M. R. , & Shain, M. (Ed. ). Holocaust scholarship: Personal trajectories and professional interpretations. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Chabot, J., Godin, R., Kappler, S., Kasparian, S. (2016). Introduction: Representations of the Armenian Genocide in the mass media. In Chabot, J., Godin, R., Kappler, S., Kasparian, S. (Ed. ). Mass media and the Genocide of the Armenians: One hundred years of uncertain representation. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. New York and London: Routledge.
	Fazlinejad, A. (2018). The Black Death in Iran, according to Iranian historical accounts from the fourteenth through fifteenth centuries. Journal of persianate studies, 11 (1), 56- 71. doi: 10.1163/18747167-12341321
	Fischer, N. (2015). Memory work: The second generation. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Futamura, M. (2008). Memory of war and war crimes: Japanese historical consciousness and the Tokyo Trial. In Macleod, J. (Ed. ). Cultural histories of military defeat in the modern era. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Goodall, J., Lee, C. (2015). Introduction. In Goodall, J. , Lee, C. (Ed. ). Trauma and public memory. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Gutman, Y., Sodaro, A. & Brown, A. D. (2016). Introduction: Memory and the future: Why a change of focus is necessary. In Gutman, Y. , Brown, A. D. & Sodaro, A. (Ed. ). Memory and the future: Transnational politics, ethics and society. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row.
	Hoppe, A. (2016). Twist to evil—An introduction to different views on catastrophes. In Hoppe, A. (Ed. ). Catastrophes: Views from natural and human sciences. New York: Springer.
	Hutton, P. H. (2016). The memory phenomenon in contemporary historical writing: How the interest in memory has influenced our understanding of history. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Jacobs, J. (2014). Sites of terror and the role of memory in shaping identity among first generation descendants of the holocaust. Qual Sociol, 37, 27- 42. doi: 10.1007/s11133-013-9270-8
	Jones, C. (2015). It’s not a disaster if it doesn’t make the 9 O’Clock News: How factual programming can shape perceptions and responses to major disasters. In Piazza, R., Haarman, L. & Caborn, A. (Ed. ). Values and choices in television discourse: A view from both sides of the screen. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Matthewman, S. (2015). Disasters, risks and revelation: Making sense of our times. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Perry, R. W. (2007). What is a disaster?. In Rodríguez, H. , Quarantelli, E. L. , Dynes, R. R. (Ed. ). Handbooks of sociology and social research. New York: Springer.
	Popescu, D. I. (2015). Introduction: Memory and imagination in the Post-Witness Era. In Popescu, D. I. & Schult, T. (Ed. ). Revisiting holocaust representation in the Post-Witness Era. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Revet, S., Langumier, J. (2015). Introduction. In Revet, S. , Langumier, J. (Ed. ). Governing disasters: beyond risk culture. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Richard, N. (2009). Sites of memory, emptying remembrance. In Lazzara, M. J. , Unruh, V. (Ed. ). Telling ruins in Latin America. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Spinks, J., Zika, C. (2016). Introduction: Rethinking disaster and emotions, 1400–1700. In Spinks, J., Zika, C. (Ed. ). Disaster, death and the emotions in the shadow of the apocalypse, 1400–1700. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Sahyouni, J. (2016). Genocide education: Promises and potential. In Demirdjian, A. (Ed. ). The Armenian genocide legacy. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Tošić, J., Palmberger, M. (2016). Introduction: Memories on the move—experiencing mobility, rethinking the past. In Palmberger, M. , Tošić, J. (Ed. ). Memories on the move. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
	石田雄. (2000). 記憶と忘却の政治学―同化政策•戦争責任•集合的記憶. 東京: 明石書店.
	伊藤正子. (2013)戦争記憶の政治学: 韓国軍によるベトナム人戦時虐殺問題と和解への道. 東京: 平凡社.
	木村周平. (2013). 震災の公共人類学揺れとともに生きるトルコの人びと. 東京: 世界思想社.
	玄田有史, 有田伸. (2018). 危機対応学明日の災害に備えるために. 東京: 勁草書房.
	ショウ·ラジブ, 塩飽孝一, 竹内裕希子. (2013). 防災教育学校•家庭•地域をつなぐ世界の事例. 東京: 明石書房.
	諏訪清二. (2011). 高校生、災害と向き合う舞子高等学校環境防災科の10年. 東京: 岩波書店.
	諏訪清二. (2015). 防災教育の不思議な力子ども•学校•地域を変える. 東京: 岩波書店.
	松井克浩. (2011). 震災·復興の社会学 2つの「中越」から「東日本」へ. 東京: リベルタ出版.
	松井典夫. (2017). どうすれば子どもたちのいのちは守れるか事件·災害の教訓に学ぶ学校安全と安全教育. 東京: ミネルヴァ書房.
	水出幸輝. (2019). 〈災後〉の記憶史メディアにみる関東大震災•伊勢湾台風. 東京: 人文書院.
	山名淳, 矢野智司. (2017). 災害と災厄の記憶を伝える教育学は何ができるのか. 東京: 勁草書房.

[1]	蔡茹, 张新平, 姚继军, 周世科. 校长积极领导力何以重要？——论其在学校背景与学生成绩之间的中介效应[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(2): 92-108.
[2]	张治. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能重塑教育的底层逻辑和可能路径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 131-142.
[3]	陈玉琨. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能时代的教育变革[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 103-116.
[4]	朱永新, 杨帆. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能与教育创新：机遇、挑战以及未来[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 1-14.
[5]	余南平, 张翌然. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对教育的影响：大国博弈新边疆[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 15-25.
[6]	倪闽景. 从学习进化的视角看ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对学习的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 151-161.
[7]	陈静远, 胡丽雅, 吴飞. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能促进以知识点为核心的教学模式变革研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 177-186.
[8]	杨宗凯, 王俊, 吴砥, 陈旭. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对教育的影响探析及应对策略[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 26-35.
[9]	周洪宇, 李宇阳. 生成式人工智能技术ChatGPT与教育治理现代化——兼论数字化时代的教育治理转型[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 36-46.
[10]	李政涛. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对基础教育之“基础”的颠覆与重置[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 47-55.
[11]	荀渊. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能与高等教育的价值和使命[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 56-63.
[12]	徐国庆, 蔡金芳, 姜蓓佳, 李政, 杨惠, 郑杰. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能与未来职业教育[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 64-77.
[13]	宋萑, 林敏. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能时代下教师的工作变革：机遇、挑战与应对[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 78-90.
[14]	郑永和, 周丹华, 张永和, 田雪葳, 王晶莹, 郑一. 计算教育学视域下的ChatGPT：内涵、主题、反思与挑战[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 91-102.
[15]	戴耘. 教育心理学的危机：挑战和定位[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(11): 4-24.