华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 179-199.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.010

• 领域 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国大学生学习与发展研究(2015—2019):主题、方法与评论

尹弘飚1, 史练1, 杨柳2   

  1. 1. 香港中文大学教育学院,香港;
    2. 清华大学教育研究院,北京 100084
  • 发布日期:2020-09-15
  • 基金资助:
    香港研究资助局一般拨款项目“多维视角下中国大学生数学学习投入的追踪研究”(CUHK 14618118)

The Empirical Research into College Students’ Learning and Development in China (2015—2019): Themes, Methods and Commentary

Yin Hongbiao1, Shi Lian1, Yang Liu2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China;
    2. Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Published:2020-09-15

摘要: 国际高等教育领域对质量保障的重视、我国高校的扩招政策以及“证据为本”教育研究的兴起,促成了全球范围内大学生学习与发展研究的发展和繁荣。本研究以2015—2019年为限,对国内中文刊物发表的大学生学习与发展的实证研究进行综述,归纳近五年来相关研究浮现的主题,分析其在研究方法与设计上的特征与不足。研究发现,过往五年中,有关我国大学生学习与发展的实证研究可分为八大主题,所使用的研究方法涵盖了量化、质性与混合三类研究路径,十五所“双一流建设”高校的研究人员在这一领域中占据了领军地位。基于过往五年的实证研究,本研究建议进一步扩充中国大学生成长的“金字塔模型”,将个体水平上不同层次的大学生成长放在逐级嵌套的个体、教学、院校与政策四层脉络之中加以理解。虽然研究主题丰富、研究方法多样,且研究者开始表现出日益清晰的方法论意识,我国的大学生学习与发展的实证研究仍然存在很多不足,如方法使用极不均衡、研究程序不够合理、可积累性不足和理论意识缺乏等。这些不足指出了未来研究的发展方向。

关键词: 质量保障, 大学生学习与发展, 实证研究, 文献述评, 中国

Abstract: Due to the international attention to quality assurance of higher education, the enrollment expansion policy in China, and the global rise of “evidence-based” educational research, there has been a worldwide growth and prosperity of research into college students’ learning and development. This study comprehensively reviewed the empirical studies on college students’ learning and development published in Chinese journals in 2015—2019. It summarized the various themes emerging from these empirical studies, and analyzed the features and defects in their research methodology and design. As revealed, in the past five year, eight themes have emerged from the empirical studies on college students’ learning and development in China and quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs have been widely used. Researchers from 15 “Double First-Class” universities take the leading role in the empirical research into college students’ learning and development. Based on these findings, we suggest that the “Pyramid Model” of Chinese college students’ growth should be further enhanced by embedding students’ multi-layer growth into a nested contexts consisting of the individual, instructional, institutional, and policy factors which influence college students’ learning and development. These empirical studies, with varied themes, methods, and scholars’ increasing awareness of methodology, have deepened our understanding. However, some notable defects are also revealed, such as unbalanced application of research methods, unjustified research designs and procedures, lack of accumulations, and insufficient theoretical awareness, etc. These shortcomings point out the directions for future improvement.

Key words: quality assurance, college students’ learning and development, empirical research, systematic literature review, China