华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 30-53.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.11.003

• 领域与主题 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国教师教育自主知识构建:意涵、进展与机制

宋萑1, 徐淼1, 吴雨桐2   

  1. 1. 教育部普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学教师教育研究中心,北京 100875
    2. 剑桥大学教育学院,剑桥 CB2 8PQ
  • 接受日期:2024-08-27 出版日期:2024-11-01 发布日期:2024-10-18
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“追踪数据驱动的职前教师学习与教师培养质量研究”(22JJD880011);2024年度北京师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费科研创新人才培育项目“教育强国建设背景下高质量教师队伍建设研究”(1243300004);北京师范大学教育学一流学科培优项目“学术单位规划-基于教师教育数据库建设的高素质专业化创新型教师队伍建设循证理论构建研究”项目(YLXKPY-XSDW202207)。

The Construction of Autonomous Knowledge in Chinese Teacher Education: Connotation, Progress and Mechanisms

Huan Song1, Miao Xu1, Yutong Wu2   

  1. 1. Center for Teacher Education Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    2. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8PQ
  • Accepted:2024-08-27 Online:2024-11-01 Published:2024-10-18

摘要:

强教必先强师,构筑基于自主知识的中国特色教师教育体系是中国当前的关键任务。在强调教师教育的科学性和学科性的基础之上,知识的涵义及其内在分析、外在整合的两条判定条件被界定,自主知识的意蕴从原创性、调适性和批判性三个方面得到阐明。自主知识的生产指向单个/份研究,涉及学术研究论文内部获得结论、生产知识的过程;自主知识的增长指代知识生成的纵切面,涉及不同学术研究之间如何互动、交流、迭代或递归。为了更清晰、具体、深入地呈现中国教师教育的研究进展、自主知识及其生产与增长情况,研究将教师教育划分为六个研究议题:目的与价值;招考、选拔与入口;师范生、教师教育者的素养;学习与发展;环境及其作用;系统。全文通过系统文献综述、内容分析与案例分析展开,所分析的文献主要是2011年《教师教育课程标准》颁布以来的科学研究,尤其是核心期刊论文与实证研究论文。在中国教师教育自主知识的生产与增长部分,政策、实践与理论三个驱动源对于该过程的影响被单独剖析,并以经典案例综合展现中国教师教育自主知识生成的驱动源、内在过程与动态机制。从当前中国教师教育自主知识构建的现状来看,已然有许多成果,整体上存在内在分析性强、外在整合性弱、演绎为主、归纳为辅、批判与否证不足的特征,未来还需在进一步解决教师教育领域长期面对的诸多核心问题的背景下持续走出独属于中国的教师教育科学建设之路。

关键词: 教师教育, 自主知识, 职前培养, 知识生产, 知识增长

Abstract:

Effective education begins with empowered teachers. A critical task for Chinese scholars today is to establish a teacher education system with distinct Chinese characteristics, grounded in autonomous knowledge. This study emphasizes the scientific and disciplinary foundations of teacher education by defining the meaning of knowledge, which is shaped by the dual requirements of internal analysis and external synthesis. The concept of autonomous knowledge is explored through three dimensions: originality, adaptability, and criticality. The production of autonomous knowledge refers to the process of deriving conclusions and generating insights within individual academic research. Meanwhile, the growth of autonomous knowledge involves the longitudinal evolution of knowledge, encompassing the interaction, communication, iteration, and recursion among various academic studies. To more clearly, specifically, and deeply present the progress of research on autonomous knowledge in Chinese teacher education, six research topics are identified in this study: 1) Purpose and value; 2) Recruitment, selection, and entry; 3) Competence of pre-service teachers and teacher educators; 4) Learning and development; 5) Environment and its role; and 6) System. This study employs systematic literature review, content analysis, and case analysis, focusing primarily on academic research conducted since the establishment of the Standards of Teacher Education Curriculum in 2011, with particular emphasis on core journal articles and empirical studies. In the section on the production and growth of autonomous knowledge in Chinese teacher education, the influences of the three driving sources—policy, practice, and theory—on this process are analyzed separately. Classic cases are used to comprehensively illustrate the driving sources, internal processes, and dynamic mechanisms involved in the generation of autonomous knowledge in Chinese teacher education. While significant progress has been made in constructing autonomous knowledge, current achievements are characterized by strong internal but weak external synthesis, a predominant use of deductive methods but limited use of inductive ones, and a lack of critical and negative assessment. Moving forward, it is essential to continue forging a uniquely Chinese path in the scientific development of teacher education, particularly in addressing the long-standing core challenges in this field.

Key words: teacher education, autonomous knowledge, teacher preparation, knowledge production, knowledge growth