华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 15-24.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.03.002

• 人工智能时代的教育转型 • 上一篇    下一篇

AI改写“历史终结”:从技术–治理双曲线到人工智能素养与人文素养并进的双框架

邵怡蕾   

  1. 华东师范大学上海人工智能金融学院,上海 200062
  • 接受日期:2025-12-24 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-03-02

AI Rewrites “The End of History” : Beyond the Technology-Governance Dual Curve toward a Convergent Framework of AI and Humanistic Literacies

Yilei Shao   

  1. Shanghai AI-Finance School, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Accepted:2025-12-24 Online:2026-03-01 Published:2026-03-02

摘要:

人工智能正在重启被福山宣告终结的历史。以“技术–治理”双曲线为核心框架展开分析,可以发现技术指数攀升与治理线性迟滞之间存在“合法性鸿沟”,而弥合这一鸿沟是应对全球危机的关键。AI驱动的当今社会正进行三大结构性变革:意识形态竞争从“理念–制度”转向“技术–治理”赛道;算力、数据与智能成为重塑国家能力的三大“政治顺差”;个体陷入“最后之人”与“被预测之人”的双重困境。由此产生的解释、规范与秩序的三重缺口,亟须人文社会科学与教育的系统性回应。基于拉图尔的行动者网络理论,可发现教育承担着双重使命:培育人工智能素养以实现人机协同,重建人文素养以赋予公民审计算法、质疑决策、参与治理的能力。唯有双轨并进,方能植入社会纠偏韧性,重构人机共生时代的信任网络与合法性。

关键词: 人工智能, 硅基经济学, 政治盈余, 技术–治理双曲线, 人工智能素养

Abstract:

Artificial intelligence is reopening the history Fukuyama once declared closed. Centering on a “Technology-Governance” Dual Curve framework, this paper examines the widening “legitimacy gap” between technology’s exponential rise and governance’s linear lag, arguing that bridging this gap holds the key to confronting today’s global crises. Three structural transformations emerge: ideological competition has migrated from the “ideas versus institutions” battleground to the “technology versus governance” arena; computing power, data, and intelligence have become the new “political surplus” reshaping national power; and individuals find themselves caught between two predicaments—Fukuyama’s “last man” and the algorithm-driven “predicted man.” These shifts have opened three critical gaps—in interpretation, in norms, and in order—that call urgently for a systematic response from the humanities, social sciences, and education. Drawing on Latour’s actor-network theory, the paper contends that education must shoulder a dual mission: fostering AI literacy for effective human-machine collaboration, while rebuilding humanistic literacy to equip citizens with the capacity to audit algorithms, challenge automated decisions, and participate in governance. Only by advancing both tracks in tandem can society cultivate the resilience to self-correct and rebuild the trust networks and legitimacy that a human-machine symbiotic era demands.

Key words: artificial intelligence, silicon-based economics, political surplus, technology-governance dual curve, AI literacy