华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 118-130.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.10.009

• 教育法治 • 上一篇    

受教育权的中国谱系:一个教育法学标识性概念的生发机制

祁占勇, 张帅正   

  1. 陕西师范大学教育学部,陕西西安 710062
  • 出版日期:2026-10-01 发布日期:2026-09-28

The Chinese Genealogy of the Right to Education: The Generative Mechanism of an Iconic Concept in Educational Law Scholarship

Zhanyong Qi, Shuaizheng Zhang   

  1. Faculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
  • Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-09-28

摘要:

受教育权是中国教育法学的主体概念,但其能否摆脱“舶来品”标签,成为中国教育法学的标识性概念,取决于其是否具有自主性。作为法律概念,受教育权是价值–规范–事实三维互动的产物。将价值–规范–事实作为理想型意义上的识别尺度,便能从与之相关的“关键事件”中,洞察受教育权概念的自主性。清末民族危机使清廷将教育视作救亡图存的工具,间接促成社会认可平等普惠的受教育理念。中国共产党领导革命后,将受教育权视作解放赋予人的权利,促使个体受教育权成为一项具有标识意义的价值追求。中华人民共和国成立后,受教育权被《中华人民共和国宪法》规定为公民的基本权利,我国逐步建立起以受教育权为支点和解释原则的教育法律规范体系,受教育权由此获得规范层面的标识性。此后,教育执法和司法不断依法对有关受教育权的制度性事实进行确认,使受教育权日益成为教育法律实践中的标识性概念。

关键词: 受教育权, 标识性概念, 教育法学, 自主知识体系

Abstract:

The right to education is a central concept in Chinese education law, yet whether it can shed the label of an imported idea and become a defining concept of the field depends on whether it has attained autonomy. As a legal concept, the right to education is produced through the interaction of value, norm, and fact. If these three dimensions are taken as ideal-typical criteria of identification, the autonomy of the concept can be discerned through the critical events associated with its formation and development. In the late Qing period, the national crisis led the Qing government to treat education as an instrument of national survival, indirectly fostering social acceptance of an egalitarian and broadly inclusive idea of education. After the Chinese Communist Party assumed leadership of the revolution, it regarded the right to education as a right conferred on the people through liberation, thereby turning the individual right to education into a value pursuit of distinctive significance. After the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the right to education was enshrined in the Constitution as a fundamental right, and China gradually established an education law regime that takes the right to education as both a pivot and an interpretive principle. In this way, the right to education acquired a defining status at the normative level. Thereafter, educational administration and adjudication continuously confirmed, according to law, the institutional facts relating to the right to education, enabling it to become an increasingly defining concept in China’s educational legal practice.

Key words: right to education, iconic concept, educational law, independent knowledge system